Let them use Crayons? #eduignite #welly

So for generations we’ve been told that learning looks like this. A typical stock photo used by newspapers which shows a nice four corner room with 30 or so kids sitting at desks responding to an all-knowing teacher by putting their hands up

This design is based on a pedagogy that kids go to school to get information because that’s where information lives – inside the books and teachers’ heads. Students then stored that knowledge in the portable memory device they are assumed to have; their brains.

When I was 11 my parents got the family a set of encyclopedias which was awesome. Because now I had access to an amazing wealth of information right there in my house. All of sudden the information was a lot closer. I could fall asleep with it at night.

Fast-forward to 1996 and we get a computer with this funny thing called a modem. At a roaring 35kbs I was online and found all of a sudden that not only could access information but I could interact with it on usenet and bulletin boards.

This year I finally got an iphone which means I can take the information with me. All of sudden if I’ve got a question, like what kind of spider is that, I don’t have to wait until I go home to get the answer. I can find out the answer on the spot.

Yet the basic design of most classrooms is still based around the idea that students receive information from schools and then take it out to use in the real world. And I’m not just talking physical design.

When we look at the online spaces that exist for students in many schools we find those same four walls exist. Cellphones are banned, social media is blocked and we sequester our students off into closed online learning spaces.

In short we replicate the same physical design of our classrooms into our online learning spaces – Our students need to come to us to get the information. It’s safe, it’s easy but it’s based upon a model of information scarcity.

However there is a downside to all this information. inappropriate content and cyberbullying. In an effort to keep students safe from both real and imagined online threats, we put up walls. filters. Bans. But these walls also stop powerful learning.

We’ve known for some time that real learning happens when a group of people sit scratching their heads as they try to solve a problem or overcome a challenge. It’s in the very design of the buildings of the venue tonight.

Earlier in the term as part of our inquiry unit on cyber-citizenship, I asked my students if they would be interested in making a submission to the Education science select committee on digital learning. The answer was a resounding yes.

The students produced an amazing video submission which I placed on our classroom blog. Within a few hours Nikki Kaye, the chairwoman of the committee, had posted a comment thanking them for their work.

Was there a risk involved in such a project? Absolutely. But they pay-off was a more authentic experience and audience for my students. Because the flip side of walling our learning spaces off is that we prevent children’s voices from getting out into society.

Over the weekend I stumbled upon the story of 10 year old Martha Payne from the UK . Martha set up a blog to review her school-supplied lunch. The blog quickly went viral after a tweet from Jamie Oliver.

When local media, picked up Martha’s blog the school’s response was to ban Martha from taking photos of her school lunch which effectively shut down her blogging and online fundraising for a school kitchen in Africa.

By Friday Martha was globally trending on twitter as people tweeted their lunches in support. Martha is back blogging and has now generated more than $120,000 in donations for a charity that is building an African school kitchen.

Martha’s story demonstrates, active participation is an inherent part of internet culture. It is the audience who defines the popularity of an idea and in reality our students no longer need our permission to publish their ideas. They’re doing it anyway.

That’s both scary and exhilarating because what we are seeing is a huge shift in power dynamics between children and institutions in the digital age. No one needs to green light content that can be seen, and yes sometimes ridiculed, by an audience of millions.

Our educational institutions can not continue to respond by bans and assuming it’s business as usual. By embracing student voice and experiential learning schools no can be a place where kids can help change the world.

Because ‘let them use crayons’ is the 21st century version of ‘children should be seen and not heard.’

6 thoughts on “Let them use Crayons? #eduignite #welly

Add yours

  1. As per usual – you rock Steph! Wish I was a student in your class but I think I’m old enough to be your mom – so proud of you!

    I not only enjoy hearing your voice in your blog but the thought provoking way in which you engage your readers and help us to use our own minds and voices.

    Keep up the great work and hear you on cyperspace again soon – I’m sure!


  2. The other concern, though, is that children often don’t have the critical thinking skills or foresight to understand the future consequences of something they post of or about themselves (of course the same could be said of many adults, but teachers and parents have ‘duty of care’ to consider in relation to their children). It’s easy to forget that anything we post on the internet is inherently public – so an offhand racist joke or inappropriate photo could have much further reaching and serious consequences than one scribbled on the front of an exercise book or passed around in the playground at lunchtime. I know this is a skill many teachers are trying to teach, but sometimes you just need life experience and maturity to really understand.

    I imagine that as our current generation of children grows up, these things will have to be taken into account when they start applying for jobs, running for public office or becoming famous in any of the countless ways that seem to be possible these days. I read a ‘joke’ news post that stated that having scanned the social media networks, particularly Facebook profiles, it was evident that there would be no-one suitable to run for President of the USA by 2050!

    It’s hard to strike a balance in any child’s life between protecting them and allowing them the freedom to experiment, learn and grow. Cyberspace has certainly added another layer of complexity and it’s interesting to consider school and tertiary learning environments in light of this.

    Thanks for an enjoyable and thought-provoking post!


    1. Hi Renee
      Although I am a strong advocate of openess you will also find that I am an equally strong advocate for teaching cybercitizenship to students. My argument is that schools need to be giving students meaningful opportunities to participate and use those skills under active supervision of teachers. I don’t think banning is the answer.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: